New Hampshire follows a modified comparative negligence doctrine—also known as the 51% rule—which states that you can recover damages from a car accident unless you’re more than 51% at fault.
Sometimes fault is clear in accidents; sometimes it’s murkier. Your state’s comparative negligence laws will determine how much you can expect to collect from injuries or damages to your vehicle in the event of an accident.
The top-rated car insurance
app Jerry
knows the importance of staying up to date on comparative negligence laws in New Hampshire. Read on to find out what comparative negligence is, how fault is decided, and how to file an insurance claim. Then stick around to learn how to protect yourself with affordable car insurance in New Hampshire
. RECOMMENDEDNo spam or unwanted phone calls · No long forms
What is comparative negligence?
Comparative negligence is a legal term that determines the percentage of fault of all parties in an accident. The rule necessitates mutual negligence in an accident and allows drivers to collect damages proportionate to their degree of fault.
For example, if you are involved in a collision and found to be 20% at fault, you will be responsible for paying 20% of the other driver’s damages. The other driver will be responsible for paying 80% of your damages.
You will not be able to collect damages if you are more at fault than the other party in an accident. This is the crux of New Hampshire’s modified comparative negligence rule.
Comparative negligence vs. contributory negligence
The three types of comparative negligence are pure comparative negligence, partial or modified comparative negligence, and contributory negligence.
Every state follows one of these principles:
Pure comparative negligence: The injured party may collect damages proportionate to their percentage of fault—unless they are 100% at fault
Partial/modified comparative negligence: The injured party may collect damages proportionate to their percentage of fault—unless they are more than 50 or 51% at fault (depending on the state)
Contributory negligence: The injured party may not collect damages if they hold any percentage of fault
Only 5 states uphold pure contributory negligence and 12 uphold pure comparative negligence. The majority recognize partial or modified comparative negligence.
What is New Hampshire’s comparative negligence law?
New Hampshire is one of 33 states that upholds modified comparative negligence. Under New Hampshire law, you are entitled to collect damages based on your percentage of fault—unless you are 51% or more at fault.
In practical terms, if you’re in an accident and are deemed 30% at fault, the other driver’s insurance will be expected to cover 70% of the damages to your vehicle.
What happens if there are more than two responsible parties?
If there are more than two individuals at fault in an accident, the fault will be split amongst them based on their proportion of blame.
New Hampshire law states that “the amount of damages to be awarded to each claimant and against each defendant in accordance with the proportionate fault of each of the parties” will be determined by the court.
How is fault decided in a comparative negligence case?
Fault is assigned by insurance companies after assessing the police report and evidence submitted by all parties.
When reporting a collision to your insurance company, document the accident site judiciously by including the following details:
Information on the vehicles involved in the collision—make, model, color
Circumstances surrounding the accident (what happened)
Weather conditions and time of day
Photographs of the accident, damages, and injuries (if any)
This information will help your insurance company accurately assign fault.
Necessary evidence in a comparative negligence case
In a comparative negligence case, the injured party holds the burden of proof, meaning they must prove the defendant acted negligently. The plaintiff must prove:
The defendant owed a duty to commit an act or refrain from committing an act
The defendant breached said duty
This breach of duty caused injury or harm to the plaintiff
The defendant was aware that their actions or inactions could cause harm to the plaintiff
The plaintiff has been injured and/or suffered damages (e.g., lost wages, hospital bills)
Without proving these five elements, the plaintiff will have no grounds for collecting damages in a comparative negligence case.
How does car insurance work with comparative negligence?
Since New Hampshire is a modified comparative negligence state, you are allowed to file a claim with the other driver’s insurance company in an accident of which you were partially at fault.
You’ll be able to claim a percentage of damages based on the amount of the other driver’s fault, but your damages will be diminished by your proportion of fault. If you are 51% or more at fault in an accident, you are barred from recovering any damages.
For example, let’s say you are in an accident with a truck driver who fell asleep at the wheel. The truck driver claims that you were intoxicated at the time of the crash. It is decided that you are 51% at fault in the collision—therefore, you will not be able to collect any damages.
MORE: How to avoid the five most common car insurance claims
How to find affordable car insurance
Don’t wait for an accident to get covered—protect yourself in advance by using the Jerry
app to find awesome savings on great car insurance. The licensed insurance broker
app Jerry collects quotes from more than 50 top insurance companies like Travelers, Nationwide, and Progressive—in seconds! Jerry even helps cancel your old policy once you’ve made your pick. Jerry users save an average of $887 a year on car insurance
. “Jerry
makes choosing new insurance as easy as grocery shopping. Even though I had a car accident within the past two years, Jerry found me a great deal with Nationwide. I went from paying $340 to $90 a month!” —Pam N.